Place In The Russia Investigation Counter
In February 2020, United States attorney was appointed to lead an investigation into the origins of the . It was reported that the investigation was focusing on former CIA director and Trump critic and whether he had mishandled evidence during the early stages of the inquiry into . linked Durham’s investigation to the Ukraine scandal, stating that Durham had sought help from Ukraine and interviewed Ukrainian citizens. The Durham inquiry has been described as an “inquiry into its own Russia investigation”. and “investigating the investigators” of the Russian interference.
Trump Impeached By The House For Abuse Of Power Obstruction Of Congress
President Donald J. Trump was impeached on Wednesday.
For the third time in the nation’s history, the House of Representatives voted to impeach a sitting president, acting after a daylong debate on whether Trump violated his oath in pressuring Ukraine to damage a political opponent.
Trump was impeached on two articles. The first vote, 230-197, accused him of abuse of power and was almost entirely on party lines it was followed quickly by a second, 229-198, vote accusing the president of obstructing Congress. The one-vote difference was that of Democrat Jared Golden of Maine, who voted yes on abuse of power and no on obstruction.
No Republicans voted against Trump. Two Democrats, Jeff Van Drew of New Jersey, who is expected to switch parties soon, and Collin Peterson of Minnesota, voted with Republicans against both articles. One Democrat, Tulsi Gabbard of Hawaii, who is running for president, voted “present” on both articles.
The trial in the Republican-controlled Senate on whether to remove the president from office will likely begin in early January. It is likely that Trump will be acquitted, because a two-thirds majority is required for conviction.
Why Was Trump Impeached
President Donald Trump was impeached on Dec. 18, 2019, on two charges: abuse of power and obstruction of Congress.
The two charges against the President abuse of power and obstruction of Congress stem from a July 25 phone call with the President of Ukraine, Volodymyr Zelensky. The content of the call first came to national attention after a whistleblower filed a report expressing concern that Trump had pushed Ukraine to investigate an energy company for which the son of his political rival, former Vice President Joe Biden, sat on the board. At around that time, the Trump administration also withheld military aid from Ukraine, and Ukraine was working to secure a meeting between Zelensky and Trump.
Testimony by current and former U.S. government officials in Fall 2019 fleshed out a narrative about how officials affiliated with the Trump Administration including his personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani and E.U. ambassador Gordon Sondland urged Ukraine to conduct that investigation, as well as one into the debunked theory that Ukraine interfered in the 2016 election.
The Democrat-led House Judiciary Committee, in outlining its case against the President, said that Trump had betrayed the nation by abusing his high office to enlist a foreign power in corrupting democratic elections, and tried to interfere with Congress Constitutionally protected power to impeach a President.
You May Like: What Is Trump Doing About Immigration
Constitutionality Of The Trial And Debate
In a two-hour presentation on February 9, the House managers argued that the Senate has jurisdiction to try the impeachment of Trump. Castor opened the defense argument with what many criticized as a rambling 48-minute presentation. He argued that the impeachment was politically motivated, and unnecessary because voters had already been “smart enough” to vote Trump out of office and, in doing so, explicitly acknowledged Biden had won a free and fair election. Raskin played video footage of the Capitol storming and Trump’s rhetoric to highlight the consequences if presidents could commit impeachable offenses in their last month without constitutional accountability.
The statement that Biden won the election was seen to have undercut both their arguments in pre-trial briefs of Trump’s repeated false claims that the election was fraudulent, stolen, and rigged and accordingly his speech on January 6 was justified because he believed the election was fundamentally “suspect.” Trump had initially made clear to advisers that he did not want his lawyers saying that Biden won the election fairly, even if it was not their main focus at the trial. Accordingly, Trump was reported to be very displeased with Castor’s performance. Castor’s argument was widely criticized for numerous bizarre and incoherent statements, such as “Nebraska, you’re going to hear, is quite a judicial-thinking place.”Alan Dershowitz stated, “There is no argument. I have no idea what he’s doing.”
| Nay | 44 |
Kupperman V House Of Representatives
On October 25, 2019, Charles Kupperman, Trump’s former deputy national security adviser, filed an advisory lawsuit, asking a D.C. federal judge to rule on whether he is lawfully obliged to comply with a subpoena he received from the House of Representatives. He said he will follow whatever the judge says. He was scheduled to testify on October 28 but did not appear. On October 31, Judge Richard J. Leon scheduled a hearing for December 10. On November 6, the House joint investigating committees dropped their subpoena of Kupperman, asking that the parties abide by the ruling in a similar lawsuit pending against Don McGahn. Judge Leon indicated that the suit will go on anyway.
On November 9, former national security advisor John Bolton, who had joined in the Kupperman lawsuit, had his lawyer send a proffer to the committees, saying he could supply much additional pertinent information the committee did not have. White House acting chief of staff Mick Mulvaney also attempted to join in the Kupperman lawsuit. On November 11, Bolton’s attorney filed a motion to block Mulvaney from joining the suit, arguing that Mulvaney had effectively waived immunity by acknowledging a quid pro quo in the Ukraine matter during an October 17 press briefing. Kupperman also objected to Mulvaney’s participation and the judge said he was inclined not to allow it, whereupon Mulvaney withdrew his request.
There were oral arguments on December 10, and the case was dismissed on December 30, 2019.
You May Like: Did Trump Close The Borders
Other Proposed Reasons For Impeachment
Some commentators have argued that Trump has abused the Presidential pardon power, specifically offering to pardon federal officials who commit crimes such as violating the rights of immigrants and any necessary to build the Trump border wall before the next presidential election. Trump also declared he had an “absolute right” to pardon himself. Controversial Trump pardons include those of Joe Arpaio, convicted of ignoring a court order to stop police misconduct with regard to immigration enforcement Dinesh D’Souza, convicted of campaign finance violations and three military servicemembers convicted of war crimes.Impeachment has notably been suggested as a remedy for abuse of pardon power by James Madison during the debate over ratification of the U.S. Constitution, and William Howard Taft in a 1925 Supreme Court decision.
Trump Impeached For ‘inciting’ Us Capitol Riot In Historic Second Charge
Watch the moment President Trump was impeached for a second time
Donald Trump has become the first president in US history to be impeached twice, after being charged with “incitement of insurrection” over last week’s deadly storming of Congress.
The House of Representatives accused Mr Trump of encouraging violence with his false claims of election fraud.
He now faces trial in the upper chamber, the Senate, but not before he leaves office next Wednesday.
Senators can vote to bar him from ever holding public office again.
In a video released after the vote in the House on Wednesday, Mr Trump called on his followers to remain peaceful, without mentioning his impeachment.
“Violence and vandalism have no place in our country… No true supporter of mine would ever endorse political violence,” he said, striking a sombre and conciliatory tone.
The FBI has warned of possible armed protests planned for Washington DC and all 50 US state capitals in the days before Joe Biden, a Democrat, is inaugurated as the new US president.
Trump: ‘Violence and vandalism have no place in our country’
You May Like: Did Trump Improve The Economy
Listen To The Daily: The Impeachment Of President Donald J Trump
- michael barbaro
-
Thats it for The Daily. Im Michael Barbaro. See you tomorrow.
Despite years of speculation, Mr. Trumps impeachment did not, in the end, grow out of the two-year investigation into Russian election meddling by Robert S. Mueller III, the special counsel, or the seemingly endless series of other accusations of corruption and misconduct that have plagued this White House: tax evasion, profiting from the presidency, payoffs to a pornographic film actress and fraudulent activities by his charitable foundation.
Instead, the existential threat to Mr. Trumps presidency centered around a half-hour phone call in July. On it, he pressured Ukraines president to announce investigations into former Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. and other Democrats at the same time he was withholding nearly $400 million in vital military assistance for the country and a White House meeting.
Congress learned about the call after an anonymous C.I.A. official lodged a whistle-blower complaint in August pulling a string that helped unravel an effort by the president and his allies to pressure a foreign government for help in smearing a political rival. Over a period of weeks this fall, a parade of diplomats and other administration officials confirmed and expanded on those revelations.
Republicans tethered themselves to Mr. Trump, as they have since he took office, yoking their political brands and fortunes to his.
Hearings And Investigations: Apriljuly 2019
- Nadler says redacted Mueller report might necessitate impeachment.
- House Judiciary Committee issues subpoena demanding the unredacted report and its underlying evidence.
- HJC issues subpoena for former White House counsel Don McGahn to testify on his statements as exhibited by the special counsel in his report.
- President Trump issues orders retroactively asserting executive privilege over all testimony given to the special counsel by McGahn and others given subpoenas by the HJC.
- Attorney General Barr threatens to boycott scheduled hearings and Nadler threatens a subpoena if he does.
- May 2: Barr boycotts hearings
- May 8: House Judiciary committee recommends Barr be held in contempt of Congress in a 24â16 vote for not complying with the subpoena.
- May 23: Rep. Shelia Jackson Lee introduces H.Res. 396, which is referred to the Rules committee.
- May 29:Robert Mueller addresses the nation on the Russia probe, saying: “the Constitution requires a process other than the criminal justice system to formally accuse a sitting president of wrongdoing.”
- : House Judiciary committee announces a series of hearings related to the Mueller Report titled “Presidential Obstruction and Other Crimes”.
- Barr offers to resume negotiations on testimony and materials if the HJC cancels contempt citation. Nadler refuses.
- Former Trump aides Hope Hicks and Annie Donaldson formally defy HJC subpoenas at the behest of the president.
Also Check: Is Trump Still Building The Wall
Report And Additional Materials
Campaign Against Marie Yovanovitch
As early as April 2018, and his associates and had apparently decided to assist President Trump’s re-election efforts and they identified the as being a difficulty. Yovanovitch had spent her thirty-year career working as a diplomat and was announced as the nominee for U.S. ambassador to Ukraine on May 18, 2016, to replace . Yovanovitch was respected within the national security community for her efforts to encourage Ukraine to tackle corruption, and during her tenure had sought to strengthen the Ukrainian , which had been created to bolster efforts to fight .
On April 24, 2019, after complaints from Giuliani and other Trump allies that Yovanovitch was undermining and obstructing Trump’s efforts to persuade Ukraine to investigate former vice president and candidate Joe Biden, Trump ordered Yovanovitch’s recall. She returned to , on April 25, with her recall becoming public knowledge on May 7, and her mission as ambassador being terminated on May 20, 2019. In a July 25, 2019 phone call with Ukrainian president , Trump pressured the Ukrainian government to investigate Biden and disparaged Yovanovitch to his foreign counterpart, calling her “bad news”.
Don’t Miss: How Many Bankruptcies Has Donald Trump Had
Trump Et Al V Deutsche Bank Et Al
The House Financial Services and Intelligence committees issued subpoenas to Deutsche Bank and Capital One Bank asking for financial records relating to Trump, his adult children, and his businesses. Trump’s personal attorneys tried to delay or prevent the information from being given to the committees by getting a court injunction. Although the defendants are Deutsche Bank and Capital One Bank, U.S. district judge Edgardo Ramos permitted representatives of the House committees to take part. Ramos canceled a May 9 preliminary hearing when the committees agreed to hand over “substantial portions” of the subpoenas to the plaintiffs. On May 22, Ramos affirmed the validity of the subpoenas. Trump’s lawyers had asked Ramos to quash the subpoenas, but Ramos said such a request was “unlikely to succeed on the merits”. The committees later reached an agreement with Trump’s lawyers to delay enforcement of the subpoenas while an appeal is filed, provided the appeal is filed in an “expedited” manner. On May 28, Ramos granted Trump’s attorneys their request for a stay so they could pursue an expedited appeal through the courts. and briefs for it were due by no later than July 12. On June 18, The Trump legal team filed a brief similar to the one in the Mazars case.
Oral arguments began on August 23.
Withholding Of Ukrainian Military Aid
The U.S. Congress had mandated increased military aid to Ukraine over the period of Trump’s presidency. Congress appropriated $400 million in for fiscal year 2019, to be used to spend on weapons and other equipment as well as programs to assist the in combating threats from Putin’s Russia and Russian-backed separatists of the self-proclaimed in eastern Ukraine. The administration notified Congress in February 2019 and May 2019 that it intended to release this aid to Ukraine, with the Defense Department certifying that Ukraine had made sufficient progress in fighting corruption. Despite the notifications to Congress, in June 2019, the Trump administration placed military aid to Ukraine on hold. The date of the hold was originally reported as mid-July.The Washington Post reported on September 23 that at least a week before his July 25 call with Zelenskyy, Trump directed his acting chief of staff to withhold $400 million in military aid to Ukraine. This directive was conveyed by the to the and , stating Trump had concerns about whether the money should be spent, with instructions to tell lawmakers the funds were being delayed due to an “interagency process”.The New York Times reported that “high-level Ukrainian officials” were aware that the Trump administration had purposely frozen the military aid by the first week of August 2019, and they were told to contact Mick Mulvaney to resolve the matter.
GAO Report: Decision on the Withholding of Ukraine Security Assistance
Read Also: How To Contact Trump Organization
Why Was Clinton Impeached
Like Johnson, President Bill Clinton had stirred up a lot of anger in Congress. After his affair with former White House intern Monica Lewinsky became public in January 1998, Clinton at first adamantly denied to federal investigators and the public having had sexual relations with her.
The articles of impeachment alleged that Clinton had perjured himself by lying to investigators about his relationship with Lewinsky. They also said that he had obstructed justice by encouraging White House staff to deny the affair.
Politicsread The Articles Of Impeachment Against President Donald Trump
The hours of back and forth before the vote offered no new evidence and shed no new light on the allegations against the president, as Republicans and Democrats mainly echoed many of the same points they’ve been making for weeks.
The proceedings were mostly civil, although some Republicans amped up the hyperbole. Rep. Barry Loudermilk of Georgia said Jesus got a fairer trial from the Roman governor who sentenced him to crucifixion than Trump had gotten from House Democrats.
“When Jesus was falsely accused of treason, Pontius Pilate gave Jesus the opportunity to face his accusers,” Loudermilk said said on the House floor. “During that sham trial, Pontius Pilate afforded more rights to Jesus than Democrats have afforded this president in this process.”
A White House official told NBC News that Trump did not plan to watch the proceedings but would keep tabs on the coverage. The official said the White House was preparing for “war.”
“We are all mad,” the official said, and Trump and his team are “angry this is happening.”
The president made that it clear on Tuesday, accusing Pelosi in an extraordinary, rambling six-page letter of orchestrating “an illegal, partisan attempted coup.”
“You are the ones subverting America’s Democracy. You are the ones Obstructing Justice. You are the ones bringing pain and suffering to our Republic for your own selfish personal, political, and partisan gain,” Trump wrote. “You view democracy as your enemy!”
Read Also: How Can I Talk To Donald Trump
