I Don’t Care How They Come In If They Come In Legally
TRUMP: I never said that.
Q: So this was an erroneous article the whole way around? My apologies.
Q : I found where I read that before. It was from the donaldjtrump.com website and it says, “Mark Zuckerburg’s personal senator, Marco Rubio has a bill to triple H-1Bs that would decimate women and minorities.”Are you in favor of H-1Bs or are you opposed to them?
TRUMP: I’m in favor of people coming into this country legally. As far as the visas are concerned, if we need people they have–it’s fine.They have to come into this country legally. We have a country of laws. It’s fine if they come in, but they have to come in legally.
How Has The Pandemic Altered Immigration Policy
The Trump administration further restricted immigration amid the COVID-19 pandemic by: curbing travel to the United States, effectively halting asylum procedures, turning away most migrants at the U.S.-Mexico border, and suspending the processing of many foreign worker visas and green cards.
The administration framed these changes as necessary to limit the viruss spread and protect American jobs, but critics accused Trump of using the public health crisis to further his anti-immigration agenda. Some argued that the detention and deportation of migrants during the pandemic fueled the viruss spread.
Despite his stated goal of reversing Trumps border policies, Biden initially maintained many pandemic-related restrictions, including limits on nonessential entry into the country. In addition, he has continued Title 42, a public health order that allows for immediate expulsion of apprehended migrants, though he exempted unaccompanied children and some adults. However, Biden has also implemented several changes, including increasing the number of visas issued to immigrants.
No Apology For Banning Muslims From Entering America
TRUMP: No. Look, we have to stop with political correctness. We have to getdown to creating a country that’s not going to have the kind of problems that we’ve had with people flying planes into the World Trade Centers, with the shootings in California, with all the problems all over the world.We have to find out what’s going on . I said temporarily. I didn’t say permanently. And I have many great Muslim friends. And some of them, I will say, not all, have called me and said, “Donald, thankyou very much you’re exposing an unbelievable problem and we have to get to the bottom of it.” We have a serious problem. And we can’t be the stupid country any more. We’re laughed at all over the world.
Recommended Reading: Did Montana Vote For Trump
We Need Wall On Mexican Border But Ok To Have A Door In It
TRUMP: If it weren’t for me, you wouldn’t even be talking about illegal immigration.This was not a subject that was on anybody’s mind until I brought it up at my announcement.The fact is, since then, many killings, murders, crime, drugs are pouring across the border, our money going out and the drugs coming in. And I said we need to build a wall, and it has to be built quickly.And I don’t mind having a big beautiful door in that wall so that people can come into this country legally. But we need to build a wall, we need to keep illegals out.
Iii Xenophobia And Us Legal Developments
This particular racial, social and political climate is reflected not only in the lives of historically marginalized groups but in a number of notable legal developments that continue to influence those experiences. First, the Administration has passed laws grounded in xenophobia but dressed in pre-textual garb. Notably, these measures have far-reaching effects, not only on vulnerable communities, but on democratic governance as well. Representative measures include the multiple iterations of the so-called travel ban and the presidential declaration of a public emergency to construct the wall at the southern border. Second, others have proposed laws as a corrective, response, and/or act of resistance to such contemporary realities. Illustrative are new domestic terrorism laws and the No Ban Act, ending the Muslim Ban while preventing similar future measures.60 Both categories are addressed below.
Read Also: Is Trump A Great President
Public Charge Restrictions On Awarding Green Cards
On August 12, 2019, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services formally announced a new rule restricting poorer immigrants from attaining Lawful Permanent Resident status, popularly known as a Green Card. Three federal courts on October 11, 2019 issued preliminary injunctions blocking the rule just four days before it had been scheduled to take effect. On December 5, 2019 the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the preliminary injunction from the California district court, ruling the administration was likely to prevail in its arguments that it had legal authority to issue the regulations. On December 9, 2019 the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the preliminary injunction from the Maryland district court. The rule remained blocked, however, due to the New York district court having issued a nationwide injunction. On January 8, 2020 the Second Circuit Court of Appeals refused to lift the New York courts nationwide injunction. On January 27, 2020 the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the Second Circuit and lifted the nationwide injunction on the rule, allowing the administration to implement the rule everywhere except the state of Illinois. On February 21, 2020 the Supreme court reversed the injunction from the Illinois district court, allowing the administration to enforce the rule nationwide.
How Are State And Local Authorities Handling These Issues
States vary widely in how they treat unauthorized immigrants. Some states, such as California, allow undocumented immigrants to apply for drivers licenses, receive in-state tuition at universities, and obtain other benefits. At the other end of the spectrum, states such as Arizona have passed laws permitting police to question people they suspect of being unauthorized about their immigration status.
The federal government is generally responsible for enforcing immigration laws, but it delegates some immigration-related duties to state and local law enforcement. However, the degree to which local officials are obliged to cooperate with federal authorities is a subject of intense debate. As of 2019, almost one-quarter of U.S. counties limit their cooperation with ICE, according to the Immigrant Legal Resource Center.
The degree to which local officials are obliged to cooperate with federal authorities is a subject of intense debate.
President Trump decried these sanctuary jurisdictions and reinstated a controversial Obama-era program known as Secure Communities, in which the FBI shares fingerprints of suspects collected by state and local law enforcement with federal immigration authorities. Under the program, state and local agencies also hand over individuals presumed to be in the country illegally. Biden terminated the program shortly after taking office.
You May Like: How Many Times Did Donald Trump File For Bankruptcy
Biden Railed Against Trumps Immigration Policies Now Defends Them In Courts
Immigration attorneys and activists have been frustrated with the slow pace of the Biden Justice Department in tackling the Trump-era immigration portfolio.
President Joe Bidens record has been at times frustrating and confusing for many advocates and lawyers. | Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images
08/10/2021 04:31 AM EDT
Over the past six months, the U.S. government has backed the expiration of certain visas, pushed for tougher requirements for investors seeking green cards, and supported the denial of permanent residency for thousands of immigrants living legally in the U.S.
If that sounds like the type of immigration portfolio former President Donald Trump would pursue, its because it is. But President Joe Biden is nevertheless defending it in court, despite a pledge to quickly reverse his predecessors hard-line immigration agenda.
Former administration officials and immigration lawyers say Bidens hands may be tied in certain cases that the government may not necessarily agree with the specific policy but that the Justice Department may have to defend Trump-era policy because of requirements in law and the time needed to review all the cases. But the Biden administrations approach is, nevertheless, testing the patience of immigration activists and attorneys who say the president and his team have been far too passive in undoing Trumps far-reaching and restrictive immigration policies in court.
The question theyre now asking is how much longer this will continue.
Dismantling Daca & Terminating Tps: A Moral And Economic Disaster That Hurts All Americans
More than one million immigrants living, working, and contributing to our communities are legally protected from deportation by Temporary Protected Status and Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals . President Trumps continued attempts to deport these members of our families and communities has been one of the defining tenets of his anti-immigrant agenda. By every measure, DACA and TPS have both been a tremendous success, helping to strengthen our communities and grow our economy, but Trump has repeatedly sought to undermine these programs through unilateral executive action. He has also wielded the threat of family separation as leverage to enact dramatic cuts to our legal immigration system, including effectively ending asylum.
The Presidents efforts have been overwhelmingly rejected by the American people, who have been galvanized by the bravery of DACA recipients and TPS holders who have courageously shared their stories. Multiple federal courts including the Supreme Court have repeatedly blocked the Trump Administrations attempts to terminate these programs. These efforts have come at a significant political cost including losing his party control of the House of Representatives in the 2018 election. These same actions continue to threaten his re-election chances this year.
The Trump Administrations Actions Targeting Dreamers and TPS Holders
The Human Impact of Ending DACA and TPS
Targeting Immigrants: A Losing Political Strategy
You May Like: How Many Times Did Trump File Bankruptcy
The Us Immigration Debate
- Immigrants have long made up a significant portion of the U.S. population. In 2020, they composed almost 14 percent.
- Congress has failed to agree on how to address immigration challenges, leaving many policy questions up to the courts and executive branch.
- President Joe Biden has reversed many of former President Donald Trumps restrictive policies, even as he has struggled with a historic influx of migrants.
So Proud I Got The Dialogue Started On Illegal Immigration
“Not at all. No, not at all.” Trump said again to applause.
Two things.I am so proud of the fact that I got a dialogue started on illegal immigration. And people in the media, in all fairness, they were very rough on me that first week, and now many of them have apologized to me.And almost everybody, because it turned out I was right. Beautiful Kate who was shot by an illegal who was here five times, and they couldn’t do anything about it, and believe me, Mexico kept pushing him back, because they didn’t want him.Believe me, that’s true. And now everybody is saying Trump was right. But I tell you, I took a lot of abuse.
Recommended Reading: What Are Trump’s Latest Poll Numbers
What Is The Immigrant Population In The United States
Immigrants compose almost 14 percent of the U.S. population, or about 45 million people out of a total of nearly 332 million in 2020, according to the Census Bureau. Together, immigrants and their U.S.-born children make up about 26 percent of U.S. inhabitants, and some researchers have predicted that this number will reach 36 percent by 2065.
President Trump Reduced Legal Immigration He Did Not Reduce Illegal Immigration
President Trump entered the White House with the goal of reducing legal immigration by 63 percent. Trump was wildly successful in reducing legal immigration. By November 2020, the Trump administration reduced the number of green cards issued to people abroad by at least 418,453 and the number of nonimmigrant visas by at least 11,178,668 during his first term through November 2020. President Trump also entered the White House with the goal of eliminating illegal immigration but Trump oversaw a virtual collapse in interior immigration enforcement and the stabilization of the illegal immigrant population. Thus, Trump succeeded in reduce legal immigration and failed to eliminate illegal immigration.
Figure 1 shows the monthly number of green cards issued to immigrants outside of the United States. In most years, about half of all green cards are issued to immigrants who already reside in the United States on another visa. Thus, the number of green cards issued to immigrants abroad is a better metric of the annual inflow of lawful permanent residents than the total number issued. Trump cut the average number of monthly green cards issued by 18.2 percent relative to Obamas second term, but that average monthly decline hides the virtual end of legal immigration from April 2020 onward.
Don’t Miss: Where Is Ivanka Trump Now
Ship Millions Back To Mexico Like Eisenhower Did
TRUMP: You are going to have to send people out. Look, we either have a country or we don’t have a country. We are a country of laws. going to haveto go out and hopefully they get back. But we have no choice if we’re going to run our country properly & if we’re going to be a country.
KASICH: If people think that we are going to ship 11 million people who are law-abiding, who are in this country,& somehow pick them up at their house & ship them out to Mexico, think about the families. Think about the children. It’s a silly argument. It is not an adult argument. It makes no sense.
TRUMP: Dwight Eisenhower, a great president, moved 1.5 millionillegal immigrants out of this country, moved them just beyond the border. They came back. Moved them again beyond the border, they came back. Didn’t like it. Moved them way south. They never came back. They moved 1.5 million out. We have no choice.
The State Of The Immigration Courts: Trump Leaves Biden 13 Million Case Backlog In Immigration Courts
When President Donald Trump assumed office, 542,411 people had deportation cases pending before the Immigration Courts. At the start of 2021, that number now stands at 1,290,766nearly two and a half times the level when Trump assumed office just four years ago. Waiting in the wings are another 300,000+ cases that President Trump’s policy changes have decided aren’t finally resolved, but have not yet been placed back on the active docket.
During the four years since Trump assumed power, none of his many policy changes made even a small dent in the pile-up of cases awaiting resolution. While the Trump administration hired many new immigration judges and implemented a range of different strategies aimed in part at reducing the Immigration Court backlog, the backlog grew each month. Some of Trump’s changes in court operations arguably slowed case processing. However, the primary driver of the exploding backlog was not only the lack of immigration judges but the tsunami of new cases filed in court by the Department of Homeland Security.
Even if the Administration halted immigration enforcement entirely, it would still take more than President-Elect Biden’s entire first term in officeassuming pre-pandemic case completion ratesfor the cases now in the active backlog to be completed.
How Long Have Individuals in the Backlog Been Waiting?
average wait until hearing scheduled 1642 days
You May Like: What Is Trump’s Tax Reform
Background In Business Practices
In March 2016, Trump addressed E-Verify, an online tool provided by the American government to detect if business employees are unauthorized aliens. Trump declared: “I’m using E-Verify on just about every job … I’ll tell you, it works.” In December 2018, The Washington Times reported that in the 565 companies that President Trump had a financial stake in as disclosed in May 2018, only 5 companies used E-Verify. In January 2019, Trump’s son, Eric Trump, said that The Trump Organization was now “instituting E-Verify on all of our properties as soon as possible”.
In November 2017, more court documents regarding the above situation of the Polish workers were unsealed. They showed that a crew of 200 Polish workers had worked on the demolition, and that Trump had ultimately paid a settlement of $1.375 million, including $0.5 million to the union fund, after appealing a judge’s ruling that he was indeed the legal employer of the Polish workers.
In July 2017, Trump’s applied for visas to hire foreign workers – 15 housekeepers, 20 cooks and 35 servers from October 2017 to May 2018. Trump National Golf Club in Jupiter, Florida did the same for 6 cooks.
Elimination Of Medical Deferred Action
On August 7, 2019 the United States Citizenship and Immigration Service terminated a program called “medical deferred action”, which allowed immigrants to remain in the country temporarily while they or their children receive treatment for serious or life-threatening medical conditions. The only exception was for military families. Without making any public announcement, the service sent letters to multiple families whose children are getting treated under this plan, telling them their permission to be in the country would be revoked in 33 days. Some patients complained they would die if they were not allowed to continue treatment in the United States. Met with public outcry, this policy change was reversed by September. In October 2019, USCIS Acting Director Ken Cuccinelli later testified to a Congressional investigation that he alone had made the decision to end the program.
Don’t Miss: How To Contact Donald J Trump
What Is The Impact Of Trumps Immigration Order
On April 20, President Donald Trump tweeted that he would suspend all immigration into the United States in order to protect American jobs during the COVID-19 crisis two days later, the administration issued a proclamation pausing the granting of green cards to manybut not allwould-be immigrants for 60 days. We asked Cristina Rodríguez of Yale Law School, whose research interests include immigration law and policy, to explain the consequences of the order.
New U.S. citizens at a ceremony in Salt Lake City in April 2019. Photo: George Frey/Getty Images.
- Leighton Homer Surbeck Professor of Law, Yale Law School
What does President Trumps immigration order mean in practical terms?
The order is unprecedented in its reach. The president has invoked a statutory authority that has been in the Code since 1952 and that numerous presidents have relied on since Ronald Reagan issued the first proclamation of its kind. Section 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act authorizes the president to suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens if he determines their entry would be detrimental to the interests of the United States. This power is breathtakingon its face it appears to allow the president to swallow altogether the intricate admissions criteria that Congress has enacted.
What is the relationship between immigration and the COVID-19 pandemic?
What would the impact of this order be on life and commerce in the United States?